Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Will Rhymes 'Fine' After Being Hit By Pitch And Fainting

Arnett Moultrie: The hottest prospect?

Bump'd:  Thanks asalom!

Now it may just be me but I’m having a ton of trouble understanding how Arnett Moultrie has quickly become one of the best, if not the best, transfer prospect in the country? I understand that the kid is talented, and has a lot of upside. However, I don’t think I’m alone in saying that his sophomore season was a real disappointment. In spite of that, some of the biggest name schools in the country have at least shown interest if not already offered. The list so far includes Texas, Kentucky, Memphis, Auburn, Miss. St., and Arkansas.

Star-divide

Arnett really showed a ton of bright spots starting in 34 of his 37 games as a freshman. He played just under 27 minutes a game and averaged 8.8 pts and 8.2 boards. He shot a nice 50.2% from the field (including 28.2% from 3 point land), but shot a dismal 53.5% from the foul line. 

After a promising trip to New Zealand to represent the USA in the FIBA U19 World Championships Moultrie seemed to be poised to have a breakout sophomore season and put himself into position to be a solid 1st round draft choice. In 9 games in Auckland against some young international competition he averaged 4.4 ppg and 6.1 rpg (which led the team) in about 15 minutes per game.

Things didn’t exactly pan out the way many had hoped. Arnett did average 1 more ppg at 9.8. However, his rebounding dropped to 6.7 rpg even with an increase in minutes to nearly 30 a game. Also, his field goal percentage dropped to 47.5% as it seemed as though he looked for his 3 point shot more than anything for a great portion of the season. Although 3 point percentage doesn’t usually mean too much for a 6-10 center, his average dropped from 28.2% to 22.5% (he shot 40 3’s on the season). The lone bright spot was the improvement of his free throw shooting from that ice cold 53.5% to a luke warm 65.1%. 

Now I really don’t want to sound like a "hater" even though I’m going to. It’s just that how can a kid who had no chance at schools like Texas and Kentucky out of high school all of the sudden be a player of great interest after the way things have gone. Not only that but have these schools really seen the desire and work ethic in him that it would take to sit out a year and still come back to compete at the highest level? Do they really think that a player that averaged nine points and six boards at a C-USA school (not that it’s a bad thing, but just doesn’t to compare to SEC or Big-12) in his "breakout year" will be able to sit a year and do anything  even close to those numbers in a premier conference? It all just seems a little odd. I wish the guy had a little more discipline this year to play his game the way he did his freshman year. Had he, he’d be getting ready to hear his name called in the NBA draft instead of worrying about which college he‘s going to next. Don’t get me wrong I wish the best to Arnett Moultrie and I thank him for his two years here at UTEP. He was a great talent and was really fun to watch play his freshman year. And even though I think his decision to leave wasn’t the best for him, I hope it works out wherever he lands.

Comment 5 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I honestly think he's been elevated by the process of elimination

Are there any other transfer prospects that anybody knows? I can’t think of anybody right now.

One of the reasons why his transfer is so perplexing is because it’s really never happened before where a guy enters his name in the draft, withdraws, then transfers? It’s perplexing.

Good post asalom!

by Adrian Mac on May 13, 2010 6:15 PM MDT reply actions  

The magic word you keep hearing is UPSIDE!

Nice post, asalom and great point AMac, but you will keep hearing about his potential and how if he would have stayed in the draft he would have been a mid second round pick. I am not denying he probably would have been drafted because AM has all the physical attributes to be a great NBA player. There are bloggers (especially Memphis homers) that compare him to KG, the only thing I compare with KG is size. He could be a good if not great NBA player if he puts in the work, but he is making the road a little bit more difficult with this transfer business. I agree to certain extent that he is being elevated by the process of elimination, but I think most coaches would take a chance on AM for one year to fill a need and if he does improve and has a great year (while improving his draft status) that will help recruiting at whatever school he chooses.

by LaOnda on May 13, 2010 7:17 PM MDT reply actions  

Tell me---who would recruit for one year of eligibility??

Is it true that one year out—-a coach can tell that the team will need help for only one year. Remember no matter where he goes he has to sit out one year!!

What about the first year recruits and others on a team sitting due to AM coming into a program and everybody knows he will bolt to NBA ??

I think that situation would be a big demorializer for those who have to sit just so the team can feature Moultrie——this I believe is why Floyd would not play that game.

by JACELP on May 13, 2010 9:24 PM MDT reply actions  

It only takes one...

I realize AM’s transfer is a unique situation, if he goes to a school without conditions from UTEP he will have 2 years of eligibility, but we all know (coaches included) that he is playing one more year. I mean look at Coach Cal, I don’t believe for a second he thought Wall and Cousins would come back for a second year. The bottom line is winning and there will be plenty of coaches who will take AM and know he is one and done (even after sitting out a year). It doesn’t make it right, but most of us know the score. Like they say it’s not personal it’s business.

by LaOnda on May 14, 2010 8:39 AM MDT via mobile up reply actions  

More to the point...

Coach Cal has gone on record as saying (and I’m paraphrasing): He would rather have the best recruits for only one year then have the second best for four. I think this is ridiculous and will eventually catch up with you or your institution, but there are many coaches out there trying to catch lighting in a bottle versus building a dynasty. Welcome to free-agency at the collegiate level!

by MinerMike on May 14, 2010 10:06 AM MDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

Welcome to the SB Nation blog dedicated to the UTEP Miners. For Miner fans, by Miner fans.

MinerRush Site Managers

Miner-xl_small Adrian Mac

Ac7cf6cc7349e7aaa364e17aa19fb11c_438px_dallas_cowboys_svg111107072248_small asalom

MinerRush Contributors

Untitled-1_small jakeprobst

Andy_small TooLegitToQuit

Chicago_flag_small PaydirtRenzo